Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

From: Stephan von Krawczynski (skraw@ithnet.com)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 04:49:05 EST

Next message: CaT: "Re: netfilter oops (Was: Re: Linux 2.4.18-pre2)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Next in thread: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 13 Jan 2002 20:17:11 -0500
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> wrote:

> For 2.5, however, I tout preempt as the answer. This does not mean just
> preempt. It means a preemptible kernel as a basis for beginning
> low-latency works in manners other than explicit scheduling statements.

Aha, exactly my thoughts...

Regards,
Stephan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: CaT: "Re: netfilter oops (Was: Re: Linux 2.4.18-pre2)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Next in thread: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:44 EST