Re: non volatile ram disk

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 18:54:22 EST

Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: pci_alloc_consistent from interrupt == BAD"
In reply to: Erez Doron: "Re: non volatile ram disk"
Next in thread: Erez Doron: "solved: ( was Re: non volatile ram disk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

erez@savan.com said:
> i tried to map an mtd device to the second part of the ram, but got
> "partition is out of reach"

The numbers you modified are the ones which say how to divide up the flash
chip. Don't do that - you need to use the 'slram' driver and configure that
to tell it which memory to use.

See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2002-January/003872.html

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: pci_alloc_consistent from interrupt == BAD"
In reply to: Erez Doron: "Re: non volatile ram disk"
Next in thread: Erez Doron: "solved: ( was Re: non volatile ram disk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:49 EST