Re: Calling EISA experts

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 14:59:48 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.17 pthread support for SEM_UNDO in semop()"
Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: Preempt & how long it takes to interrupt (was Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable)"
In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Next in thread: Dennis Boylan: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:57:14PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Yup. This is the first, and so far the only, C-level kernel patch that
> I've added to the CML2 kit.

How about just forwarding that bit along to Linus instead ?
Given how small and non-intrusive it is, inclusion in 2.4
isn't such a bad idea either.

This way, at least when your magical autoconfigurator is
finished, there's a higher chance that the patches it relies
on are in everyday use.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.17 pthread support for SEM_UNDO in semop()"
Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: Preempt & how long it takes to interrupt (was Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable)"
In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Next in thread: Dennis Boylan: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:56 EST