From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Missing changelog to Ingo's J5 scheduler?
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:56:09 +0100 (CET)
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> > Yes. -J5 is even better here. With -J4 moving windows arround or doing
> > other GUI intensive stuff was interactive for a short time (1-2
> > seconds?) - and then the programm lost all interactivity (with some
> > unniced gcc in the background ...). With -J5 all applications keep
> > smoth even with two rebuilds (unniced) of a distribution running!
>
> could you also compare -J5 to -J2? [use the 2.4 patch, or vanilla
> 2.5.3-pre4 which has J2.]
Ok. After some massive rebooting:
-J2 is worser. starting XFree(+gnome) when three gcc's are running
take long (> half a minute?). With -J5 X start nearly normal (mostly
file access time anyway?) Dragging windows arround is nearly
equal. Although with -J2 i sometimes noticed a really big latency when
starting vim or man ...
Oh. btw. The -J5 was tested with 2.4.18-pre7; the rest was with
vanilla-2.4.17 - I hope this doesn't make a performance difference for
this tests ...
> Ingo
k33p h4ck1n6
René
-- René Rebe (Registered Linux user: #248718 <http://counter.li.org>)eMail: rene.rebe@gmx.net rene@rocklinux.org
Homepage: http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/
Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:19 EST