On 24 January 2002 01:36, info@global-digicom.com wrote:
> I am interested in reviewing the technical specifications on the Linux
> kernel VM. As there has been much controversy of late on this subject, it
> would be relevant to compare the concepts behind both the former VM and the
> new VM in order to obtain a better understanding of the issues. Is there a
> “white paper” available on both the old and the new VM’s? Understandably,
> the VM is a work in progress; however, there should be a basic set of
> design goals and concepts from which future development will proceed. It
> would definitely be helpful to present them both as an aid to further
> analysis.
It was said that code is sufficient, you can read it and ask questions on
lkml if you will find difficult to swallow parts. You may spot some bugs
also, that will be very good! Linux kernel needs peer review!
Writing docs wastes developer's time: they will write how they want VM to
operate or how they think it operates (while some bug can make actual VM
operate differently) instead of improving/debugging current VM code.
After you got to understand how Linux VM works from source, feel free to
write docs.
Yes, it is not an easy path to VM doc. :-)
I must say I did not do it (yet?).
-- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:20 EST