Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 15:14:53 EST

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
In reply to: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> Because you never test against X==true. You always test X!=false. This is
> the C way.

That is the theory, yes... :)

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal
Building 1024    |  through an internally-buttered weasel."
MandrakeSoft     |             - goats.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
In reply to: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:23 EST