Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch

From: J Sloan (jjs@lexus.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 20:19:06 EST

Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory 2.4.7-10"
Previous message: Tim Moore: "Re: Disk corruption - Abit KT7, 2.2.19+ide patches"
In reply to: J Sloan: "Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Next in thread: Mark Hahn: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oops, braino - if anyone is curious about the
graphs even after seeing the raw histograms,
they are at

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory 2.4.7-10"
Previous message: Tim Moore: "Re: Disk corruption - Abit KT7, 2.2.19+ide patches"
In reply to: J Sloan: "Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Next in thread: Mark Hahn: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:27 EST