le ven 25-01-2002 à 12:28, Thomas Hood a écrit :
> In that case, perhaps it would be more perspicuous to define
> a "bit" type rather than a "bool" type, and to use 0 and 1 as
> its values rather than 'true' and 'false'. (A "bit" type
> would have all the advantages mentioned earlier by Peter Anvin
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101191106124169&w=2 .)
in the hypothetical 'bit type' case:
bit n;
n = 2;
printf("n = %d\n", n);
guess what ? n = 0
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:31 EST