Frank van Maarseveen schrieb:
>
> This doesn't seem to work due to inode number differences. Is
> this a fundamental problem or can it be solved somehow, e.g.
> by an attribute which refers to a sort of "original" inode
> number?
>
> or by a more advanced inode number synthesis in fs/isofs?
>
Don't know about isofs, but hardlinks do not use an inode.
It's just another entry in a directory pointing to a "used"
inode (there is another entry refering to the same inode)
fast symlinks do occupy an inode, symlinks an inode + 1 diskblock.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:32 EST