Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Since the page was copied to the child, the child's page table must be
> altered, and since it is shared, it must first be instantiated by the child.
> So after all the dust settles, the parent and child have their own copies of
> a page table page, which differ only at a single location: the child's page
> table points at its freshly made CoW copy, and the parent's page table points
> at the original page.
>
> The beauty of this is, the page table could just as easily have been shared
> by a sibling of the child, not the parent at all, in the case that the parent
> had already instantiated its own copy of the page table page because of an
> earlier CoW.
Ok. Still seems like a bit more copying than necessary. I'd have
to look at it a bit more and do some noodling.
> Confused yet? Welcome to the club ;-)
Does my head exploding qualify for "confused"? If so, then I'm not
yet "confused". I'm "concerned", since my ears are bleeding (a
precursor to an explosion) ;-p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, SSE, VitalStream, Inc. rstevens@vitalstream.com -
- 949-743-2010 (Voice) http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- "More hay, Trigger?" "No thanks, Roy, I'm stuffed!" -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:55 EST