On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Doug Ledford wrote:
[...]
> > Are the fixes in this going to be applicable to 2.2 also (FWIW, 2.2's
> > i810_audio #defines ``DRIVER_VERSION "0.17"'')?
>
>
> I'm sure the fixes are relevant. How well they may integrate into 2.2 is
> another question :-/
Indeed ;-) Alan?
[...]
> The best I can do it to make a diff between the 0.17 driver version I have
> here and the 0.21 driver version. Maybe that incremental diff will apply to
> the 2.2 kernel's i810_audio.c and bring it up to date without any specific
> back port needed. It's attached.
Thanks anyway, but it doesn't look too hopeful (patch complaints
appended). I suspect your "0.17" and 2.2's "0.17" may not be the same
thing (in 2.2.21pre2 i810_audio.c is 51877 bytes and "sum (GNU textutils)
2.0" reports "44467 51"
Regards,
Neale.
$ patch --dry-run < 2.2-i810.patch
patching file `i810_audio.c.17'
Hunk #1 succeeded at 181 (offset -25 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 576.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 653.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1107.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1117.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1138.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1169.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1127 with fuzz 1 (offset -248 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 1278.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 1492.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 2175.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 2877.
10 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to i810_audio.c.17.rej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:57 EST