Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@ns.caldera.de)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 17:08:52 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas for 2.5.3-pre6"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <p73aduwddni.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> you wrote:
> "Most times". For example the EA patches have badly failed so far, just because
> Linus ignored all patches to add sys call numbers for a repeatedly discussed
> and stable API and nobody else can add syscall numbers on i386.

There still seems to be a lot of discussion vs EAs and ACLs.
Setting the suboptimal XFS APIs in stone doesn't make the discussion
easier.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas for 2.5.3-pre6"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:07 EST