On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Calin A. Culianu wrote:
> Thank you kindly, Daniel. It's strange that register 95 is ommitted. We
> definitely can conclude that register 55 is not the one to set on the
> kt266 motherboards (whereas on the other via motherboards it *is* the one
> to set... I even have the spec sheet to prove it! :) )
oh .. .there are some differences between the registers in the chipsets
... the kt 133 and the kt133 are very simmilar, the kx133 also ... the
kt266 and 266a are a bit different from the kt/kx ....
i uped the pcr files for the kt133 and kx133 also
so the urls for the three files:
http://cip.uni-trier.de/nofftz/linux/kt266_pcr.txt
kt133_pcr.txt
kx133_pcr.txt
this are all i have at the moment ...
> I really wish VIA were more willing to cooperate with us and give us spec
> sheets. It's to their advantage to have us make their buggy motherboards
> work well with linux, for crying out loud! I really don't get what the
> big deal is. I mean it's not like the concept of setting bytes on a pci
> device to change functionality is so revolutionary it deserves to be
> obfuscated...
yes ... the support of via and some other big vendors could really be
better :(
maybee they are getting used to that we do the work for them ...
daniel
# Daniel Nofftz
# Sysadmin CIP-Pool Informatik
# University of Trier(Germany), Room V 103
# Mail: daniel@nofftz.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:08 EST