Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 21:21:38 EST

Next message: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: Could not compile md/raid5.c and md/multipath.c in 2.5.3-pre3"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:20:10PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:

> I feared this too, but eventually I decided it was worth it and
> benchmarks backed that up. If nothing else this is yet-another-excuse
> for locks that can spin-then-sleep.
> I posted dbench results, which show a positive gain even on 2-way for
> multiple client loads.

did you benchmark with anything other than dbench ?

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: Could not compile md/raid5.c and md/multipath.c in 2.5.3-pre3"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:12 EST