> [PATCH]: O(1) 2.4.17-J7 Tuneable Parameters
>
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> This patch synchronizes with J7 and I think makes the changes
> you wished. A couple of important points:
>
> - This patch can be applied to EITHER 2.4.17 OR 2.4.18 pre 7 as
> long as Ingo's J7 patch is applied first.
>
> - While I agree with you on not wanting these in the mainline kernel,
> I ran Hackbench on one of our new Foster systems with and
> without the tuneable parameters, and while the numbers do
> degrade slightly, its rather suprisingly small. So dont be afraid
> to use this as a system tuning aid.
>
How big is the actual degradation in your test? IIR, Ingo is afraid
that the tunables could easily screw things up, which of course is true.
What about adding a kernel-build option that leaves the sysctl interface
read-only by default and enables writing only if it is requested at
build time?
That way the external interface stays constant.
Martin
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:17 EST