> This is very strange. Is the client machine constant? What kernel does
> it use? Is it reproducible against multiple client kernels? This sounds
> like a fairly serious regression. Are you always using tux as the httpd?
> What about other httpd's?
It's not related to the client at all. It's reproducable with
dd if=file00 of=/dev/null &
dd if=file01 of=/dev/null &
dd if=file02 of=/dev/null &
dd if=file03 of=/dev/null &
dd if=file04 of=/dev/null &
.
.
.
dd if=file99 of=/dev/null &
It's reproducable on all 2.4.x I've tried. That is - with slight
differences
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:42:38PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > strangely, rmap11c seems to be quite stable, but only gives me ~32MB/s,
> > whereas the initial is close to 50.
> > I have posted mesages about this bug so many times now, that I really soon
> > will try to install CP/M or something. At least a stable system!
> > And - yes! - I have tried Andrea's patches. The only fscking thing that
> > seems to be close to solving it is rmap11c
> > Please help me about this
>
> I will at least attempt to reproduce this behavior. I'm suspicious that
> the problem could lie in a dark corner only tangentially VM-related, as
> you seem to be able to reproduce it under a variety of VM's.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCAComputers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:22 EST