On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:04:49AM -0700, Richard Gooch wrote:
> I'd prefer if tree maintainers (that means you, Alan:-) don't apply
> devfs patches that didn't come from me. I've already posted a patch
> which cleans up *all* the remaining printk()'s. In fact, it's a pair
> of patches, one for 2.4.x and one for 2.5.x. That was yesterday. Today
> I'm still seeing this thread being beaten to death.
First, before I get to my point, I want to say that I fully understand
your argument, and I also bitch when people patch the files I maintain.
But.
That is courtesy, not a right or need. The -beauty- of open source is
that anyone can hack on my files, or devfs, and if the patch makes
sense, it will get applied, regardless of whether I am a crotchety old
a-hole or not. (I am :))
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:23 EST