Re: Kernel -- GCC Version

From: Wakko Warner (wakko@animx.eu.org)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 20:37:26 EST

Next message: Paulo Andre': "Oops in 2.5 kernels - SCSI related issues"
Previous message: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
In reply to: Ro0tSiEgE: "Kernel -- GCC Version"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I've looked on kernel.org, in the kernel sources, it its not really clear,
> from what I would see. If someone could tell me exactly what are the best
> and/or what Linus uses versions of gcc, etc. for compiling the different
> kernels? (2.0/2.2/2.4/2.5) Thanks!

I don't recommend gcc 3.0 for kernel compiles as I had problems with it on
the system I tried it on.

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paulo Andre': "Oops in 2.5 kernels - SCSI related issues"
Previous message: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
In reply to: Ro0tSiEgE: "Kernel -- GCC Version"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: Kernel -- GCC Version"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:29 EST