RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 16:57:31 EST

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: further llseek cleanup (1/3)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: real BK usage (was: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin)"
In reply to: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
Next in thread: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Kris Urquhart wrote:

> Dec 31 23:42:41 jumptec kernel: VFS: Disk change detected on device
> ide0(3,3)
> Dec 31 23:42:41 jumptec kernel: VFS: Disk change detected on device
> ide0(3,3)
> Dec 31 23:42:41 jumptec kernel: invalidate: dirty buffer

I'd say... Looks like a broken disk change check and everything after
that is not a surprise.

What patches do you have applied and what chipset it is?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5: further llseek cleanup (1/3)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: real BK usage (was: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin)"
In reply to: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
Next in thread: Kris Urquhart: "RE: PROBLEM: ext2/mount - multiple mounts corrupts inodes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:39 EST