On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, James Simmons wrote:
> > > + scancode = scancode >> 1; /* lowest bit is release bit */
> > > + down = scancode & 1;
> > Shouldn't that be the other way 'round?
> I don't know. Anyone?
Me neither, this just looked weird to me, since this code is equivalent to
down = (scancode & 2) >> 1;
scancode = scancode >> 1;
and this is not what I'd expect from the comment. :-)
Simon
-- GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc Fingerprint: DC26 EB8D 1F35 4F44 2934 7583 DBB6 F98D 9198 3292 Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:40 EST