Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5

From: Momchil Velikov (velco@fadata.bg)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 09:59:58 EST


>>>>> "Ingo" == Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:

Ingo> files are used. With one big file (or a few big files), the i_shared_lock
Ingo> will always bounce between CPUs wildly in read() workloads, degrading

Will there be difference between bounces of a rwlock in the radix tree
variant and the cache misses in hashed locks variant for the case of
concurrently accessed large file ?

Regards,
-velco

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:14 EST