On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:20:08PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> Ok, the tricky part of direct io on reiserfs is the tails. But,
> since direct io isn't allowed on non-page aligned file sizes, we'll
> never have direct io onto a normal file tail.
>
> < 2.4.18 reiserfs versions allowed expanding truncates to set i_size
> without creating the corresponding metadata, so we still have to deal
> with that. It means we could have a packed tail on any file size,
> including those bigger than the 16k limit after which we don't create
> tails any more.
>
> Chris and I had initially decided to unpack the tails on file open
> if O_DIRECT is used, but it seems cleaner to add a
> reiserfs_get_block_direct_io, and have it return -EINVAL if a read
> went to a tail. writes that happen to a tail will trigger tail
> conversion.
This is a safe approch (no risk of corruption etc..). However to provide
the same semantics of the other filesystems it would be even better if
we could unpack the tail within reiserfs_get_block_direct_io rather than
returning -EINVAL, but ok, most apps should work fine anyways (and as
worse people can workaround the magic by remounting reiserfs with notail
before writing the data that will need to be handled later via
O_DIRECT).
thanks for the patch,
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:24 EST