On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Aaron Sethman wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > >
> > > But do you remember that this fd is ready until EWOULDBLOCK?
> > > i.e. if you're notified that an fd is ready, and then you
> > > don't for whatever reason continue to do I/O on it until EWOULDBLOCK,
> > > you'll never ever be notified that it's ready again.
> > > If your code assumes that it will be notified again anyway,
> > > as with poll(), it will be sorely disappointed.
> >
> > Yeah that was the problem and I figured out how to work around it in the
> > code. If you are interested I can point out the code we have been working
> > with.
>
> Yes, I would like to see it; is it part of the mainline undernet ircd cvs tree?
This is part of the Hybrid ircd tree I've been talking about.
http://squeaker.ratbox.org/ircd-hybrid-7.tar.gz has the latest snapshot of
the tree. Look at src/s_bsd_sigio.c for the sigio code.
Regards,
Aaron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:31 EST