On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Darren Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been testing the modified Undernet (2.10.10) code with Vincent
> Sweeney based on the simple usleep(100000) addition to s_bsd.c
>
> PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU | # USERS
> 2 0 96348K 96144K poll 0 29.0H 39.01% 39.01% | 1700 <- Without
> Patch
> 10 0 77584K 77336K nanslp 0 7:08 5.71% 5.71% | 1500 <- With
> Patch
Were you not putting a delay argument into poll(), or perhaps not letting
it delay long enough? If you just do poll with a timeout of 0, its going
to suck lots of cpu.
Regards,
Aaron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:35 EST