Re: windows is more secure than linux!!

From: Drew P. Vogel (dvogel@intercarve.net)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 16:00:23 EST


One thing I haven't seen argued is what I find most important. The time
frame in which I am vulnerable. I'd rather have 10x the number of
vulnerabilities which last 1/10th the time.

--Drew Vogel

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

>On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, william fitzgerald wrote:
>
>> some of you might find this interesting others
>> disheartening
>
>Still others, like me, find it very encouraging
>that Microsoft can't stop talking about Linux.
>They must be enthusiastic about it, or something.
>
>> www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=16886&u_id=623
>
>Now add the security holes in ISS, Outlook, Exchange,
>Access and all available pieces of Windows software
>into the picture so Linux and Windows are measured on
>an equal ground.
>
>Lies, damn lies & statistics.
>
>regards,
>
>Rik
>--
>DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/
>
>http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:44 EST