Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 18:35:35 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Problems with iso9660 as initrd"
In reply to: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <20020206172025.H21624@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
By author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Unlike d) with LDT, where unmodified glibc could work with older kernels
> too, thus would mean strict kernel minimum version requirement (with LDT d)
> it would be just an optimization).
>

Just make it a fallback option.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Problems with iso9660 as initrd"
In reply to: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:55 EST