[anglophobes, ne lisez pas la suite :-)]
Hi !
Le Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez a
écrit:
> One day I tried again to boot those "problematic" kernels from the
> same
> PC, now upgraded to Woody, and the problems appeared in the same
> places.
> One thing that I noticed is that Alan's 2.4.x-acY kernels had no
> problems booting where plain 2.4.x kernels failed.
thanks a lot for the tip !
I compiled a kernel from the "plain" 2.4.13 sources with the ac-8 patch
and it works fine.
haaa... my radeon works and I can play tuxracer; great !
more seriously, thanks to all the people making the ac kernel-variants.
Just one more -silly?- question: it seems -for me at least- that some
of the ac patches should be integrated in the kernel, why aren't they ?
(I repeat that ANY 2.4.17 variant I compiled won't even boot ! I'm not
talking about kernel panic here)
is my hardware so exotic ??
thanks again.
PS: it worked also with a 2.4.13-ac5 :-)
PPS: I don't mind to buils a few more kernel to identify which part(s)
of the ac patches is(are) responsible of this non-non-booting ;-)
situation but I need someone to guide me.
PPPS: I'll have some time in a week; tomorrow I go skiing 8-)
-- Stéphanie, Fabrice et Fiona -o) stephanie.dupuis@free.fr /\\ fabrice.eudes@free.fr _\_V - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:56 EST