On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:36:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[...Talking about BitKeeper adoption...]
> That will be very convenient for multiple patches, but at the
> same time that will require more trust in the source, so I'll probably
> keep the "patches as diffs in emails" for the occasional work, and the
> direct BK link for the people I work closest with.
What about people who send you occasionnal patches, and happen to
be using Bitkeeper too ?
Do you still prefer only regular patches from them or you would
accept something generated with a:
bk send -d torvalds@transmeta.com
(which prepends the bk changeset with the equivalent in unified diff
format, so you can have the best of both worlds) ?
In the latter case Documentation/SubmittingPatches should be updated
with the proper BitKeeper syntax to use etc.
Stelian.
-- Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com> |---------------- Free Software Engineer -----------------| | Alcôve - http://www.alcove.com - Tel: +33 1 49 22 68 00 | |------------- Alcôve, liberating software ---------------| - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:59 EST