Hi,
tried the patch. The problem looks gone, although i've placed
the system under even some more load than before (8.9, maybe not
impressive but first time for this one).
The reiserfsck showed up some nasty looking errors:
shrink_id_map: objectid map shrinked: used 4096, 5 blocks
grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120, 5 blocks
grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 10240, 10 blocks
bad_leaf: block 211482 has wrong order of items
...more of that...
free block count 1326452 mismatches with a correct one 1326458.
on-disk bitmap does not match to the correct one. 1 bytes differ
"reiserfsck --rebuild-tree" cured them without visible damages for now.
There were some messages about deleted blocks, expanded objectid map,
shrinked map and one "dir 1 2 has wrong sd_size 120, has to be 152".
I can send you logs, if needed.
Does the 2.5.4-pre2 contains this patch ?
-alex
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:44:20AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:23:48AM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
>
>> There were no crashes or suspicious messages on the console.
>> Nothing special in logs, and sorry, reiserfs self-debugging
>> wasn't enabled.
> Can you try the patch attached? It may not fix the thing, but
> we want to be sure (and we'll try to reproduce locally atthe same time).
> Also try to run reiserfsck --check on your reiserfs partitions.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
> --- linux-2.5.4-pre1/fs/reiserfs/inode.c.orig Wed Feb 6 11:18:35 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.4-pre1/fs/reiserfs/inode.c Wed Feb 6 11:12:08 2002
...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:01:07 EST