Re: [PATCH] size-in-bytes

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:38:39 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: jiffies rollover, uptime etc."
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Page table sharing"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] size-in-bytes"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] size-in-bytes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On February 19, 2002 12:29 am, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> >> This is ugly, one finds a lot of shifting left and right, as in
> >> limit = (size << BLOCK_SIZE_BITS) >> sector_bits;
>
> > We want to stay with the shift counts.
>
> You misunderstand.
> I meant what I said in a very literal way, not as some kind
> of colloquial expression.
> And "left and right" has been replaced by "right".

Right, sorry.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: jiffies rollover, uptime etc."
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Page table sharing"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] size-in-bytes"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] size-in-bytes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:16 EST