On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > We'll need protection from the swapout code.
>
> Absolutely NOT.
>
> If the swapout code unshares or shares the PMD, that's a major bug.
>
> The swapout code doesn't need to know one way or the other, because the
> swapout code never actually touches the pmd itself, it just follows the
> pointers - it doesn't ever need to worry about the pmd counts at all.
The swapout code can remove a page from the page table
while another process is in the process of unsharing
the page table.
We really want to make sure that the copied-over page
table doesn't point to a page which just got swapped
out.
regards,
Rik
--
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:17 EST