Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 20:23:01 EST

Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes."
Previous message: Keith Moore: "RE: Disgusted with kbuild developers"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> if that is your concern. Personally, I think "Not a typewriter"
> was a warmer and fuzzier reference to the roots, but oh well...
> Dennis giveth, TOG taketh away...

TOG says you are right. -ENOTTY is the right thing in most cases
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes."
Previous message: Keith Moore: "RE: Disgusted with kbuild developers"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: ENOTTY from ext3 code?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:22 EST