Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> :
[...]
> Now... You just want to introduce an artificial struct which contains
> only the union... Why?
Copy-paste abuse.
> We could use just the union instead (?).
Yes. I'll try that tonite.
[...]
> Yes, the compiler would compile that. Anyway, don't you think it's
> a little messy? Void * pointers are IMHO not that evil.
Once the union in a struct disappears it should be minimal.
Regarding void * against union/union * I feel like minimal type checking is
better than none.
-- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:24 EST