Re: [2.2.18-rc1] sis.o missing symbol errors (still)

From: Thomas Winischhofer (tw@webit.com)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 13:45:28 EST


walt wrote:
> In order to avoid missing-symbol errors for drm/sis.o
> *all* of the following options must be set, even though
> the specified SiS chips are not being used:
>
> CONFIG_FB=y
> CONFIG_FB_SIS=y/m
> CONFIG_FB_SIS_300=y
> CONFIG_FB_SIS_315=y

I have a 630 and sisfb and sis (drm) compile well *without* 315... Just
remember to insmod sisfb.o BEFORE sis.o.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
mailto:tw@webit.com                  *** http://www.webit.com/tw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:26 EST