On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:51:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> > regions of memory. I would propose that the maintainer of
> > vmalloc.c look at using 48 bit PTE entries or some other solution
> > as a way to alloc larger virtual address frames when the system has
> > a lot of physical memory. It's seems pretty lame to me for a machine
> > with 2 GB of physical memory not to have at lest 256 MB of address space
> > left over for address mapping.
>
> Instead of constantly trying to map >32-bit addresses onto 32-bit
> processors, why not just get a 64-bit processor?
>
> One constantly runs into limitations with highmem...
>
> Jeff
Sigh .... I am only using 2 GB on a 4GB capable processor (actually
a 64 GB capable processor). Looks like a patch is needed. Who is
maintaining vmalloc.c at present so I know who to submit a patch
to?
Jeff
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik | "Why is it that attractive girls like you
> Building 1024 | always seem to have a boyfriend?"
> MandrakeSoft | "Because I'm a nympho that owns a brewery?"
> | - BBC TV show "Coupling"
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:28 EST