> /*
> * National Semiconductor PC87307/PC97307 (ala SC1200) WDT driver
> * (c) Copyright 2002 Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@commfireservices.com>,
> * All Rights Reserved.
> * Based on wdt.c and wdt977.c by Alan Cox and Woody Suwalski respectively.
whee, nice and clean driver....
> #include <linux/config.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/version.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> #include <linux/watchdog.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/fcntl.h>
> #include <asm/semaphore.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
try deleting all includes and rebuild this list from scratch... I'll bet
it can be made smaller.
> static int sc1200wdt_status(void)
why not make this 'static inline' too, it's pretty small, and
sc1200wdt_read_data is likewise static inline.
> static int sc1200wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> unsigned char reg;
>
> /* allow one at a time */
> if (down_trylock(&open_sem))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> MOD_INC_USE_COUNT;
No need for MOD_INC_USE_COUNT when you initialize "owner: THIS_MODULE".
Maybe this is a cleanup you copied from another driver, and this change
needs to be propagated to other drivers too?
> if (timeout > 255)
> timeout = 255;
IMHO use a constant here instead of magic number 255. maybe use max()
or max_t(), too.
> case WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT:
> if (get_user(new_timeout, (int *)arg))
> return -EFAULT;
> if (new_timeout < 0 || new_timeout > 255)
> return -EINVAL;
likewise
> static int sc1200wdt_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> lock_kernel();
>
> /* Disable it on the way out */
> sc1200wdt_write_data(WDTO, 0);
> up(&open_sem);
>
> unlock_kernel();
>
> printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Watchdog disabled\n");
> MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
>
> return 0;
> }
are you certain we need lock_kernel(), unlock_kernel() here?
especially with a semaphore...
> static struct file_operations sc1200wdt_fops =
> {
> owner: THIS_MODULE,
> write: sc1200wdt_write,
> ioctl: sc1200wdt_ioctl,
> open: sc1200wdt_open,
> release: sc1200wdt_release,
> };
I noticed wdt_pci.c implements ->read, too, why not here as well?
> static int __init sc1200wdt_probe(int base_io)
> {
> /* How can we probe for this thing? */
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int __init sc1200wdt_init(void)
Look at how i810_rng does its PCI probe. [I'm guessing] Surely this
SC1200 hardware has _some_ sort of identifier, like a list of commonly
found PCI host bridges, that is better than the simple request_region()
provided.
Overall, looks good... nice, clean driver.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "Why is it that attractive girls like you
Building 1024 | always seem to have a boyfriend?"
MandrakeSoft | "Because I'm a nympho that owns a brewery?"
| - BBC TV show "Coupling"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:30 EST