> Thanks Alan and Jeff for the input, i'll cleanup this stuff. Out of
> interest, do we normally take in patches for specialised embedded boxes? I
A lot of the watchdogs are for specific embedded boards. It is improving as
vendors (notably Intel) figure that watchdogs on the chipset are not much
silicon and very useful
> to integrate. I presume they'd get accepted if the code was broken up into
> seperate modules instead of being overly specialised. For example, the
> CRIS stuff in the Etrax tree (developer.axis.com).
Etrax is an entire architecture - its a bit differently weird 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:33 EST