Keith Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:16:22 +0100,
> Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
>
>>... I would like to finish some other minor things there
>>as well. I mean basically the macro games showing that somebody didn't
>>understand C pointer semantics found at places like:
>>
>>#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3
>>extern unsigned int pci_init_ali15x3(struct pci_dev *, const char *);
>>...
>>#define PCI_ALI15X3 &pci_init_ali15x3
>>#else
>>...
>>#define PCI_ALI15X3 NULL
>>#endif
>>
>>This should rather look like:
>>
>>#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3
>>extern unsigned int pci_init_ali15x3(struct pci_dev *);
>>#else
>>#define pci_init_ali15x3 NULL
>>#endif
>>
>
> That will probably break with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS. At the very least it
> will require make mrproper when changing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 and
> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is set to y.
No it won't. The functions above are:
1. Not exported at all to modules.
2. If the will be exported it will happen through a generic
struct of function pointers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:50 EST