Re: [RFC] [PATCH] C exceptions in kernel

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 10:21:00 EST

On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:18:29PM +0000, Dan Aloni wrote:
> The attached patch implements C exceptions in the kernel, which *don't*
> depend on special support from the compiler. This is a 'request for
> comments'. The patch is very initial, should not be applied.
>
> I actually got this code to work in the kernel:
>
> try {
> printk("TEST: before throwing \n");
> throw(1000);
> printk("TEST: won't run\n");
> }
> catch(unsigned long, value) {
> printk("TEST: caught: %ld\n", value);
> } yrt;

Can they fall through multiple function calls? How do they jive with
preemtive scheduling? How much is the stack unwinding overhead?

Potentially this is very cool but I'm again appalled at the INSTANT
rejection seen here by kernel hackers, minor and major. Do NOT reject an
idea before you've thought it through. Do NOT reject an idea simply because
it is new.

Also, do not jump on the bandwagon BECAUSE it is new. But still - people
here should get a life if they get off on rejecting new stuff because it is
new.

Regards,

bert 

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl           - Nerd Available -
Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control: http://ds9a.nl/lartc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:50 EST