Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 10:43:53 EST

Next message: Hans-Joachim Baader: "2.4.18-rc4 compile problem"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "[PATCH] 2.5.5 IDE cleanup 12"
In reply to: Paul G. Allen: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Next in thread: gmack@innerfire.net: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:27:21AM +0000, Paul G. Allen wrote:

> Which compiler, of all of the different versions, generates the most
> stable and fastest code. Compile speed and kernel size is not NEARLY as
> important as performance. So, which compiler fits the bill?

GCC 3.1, is what I'm told. 3.x has the infrastructure to do more optimizing,
but doesn't do all of it yet. 3.1 is supposed to.

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl           - Nerd Available -
Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control: http://ds9a.nl/lartc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans-Joachim Baader: "2.4.18-rc4 compile problem"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "[PATCH] 2.5.5 IDE cleanup 12"
In reply to: Paul G. Allen: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Next in thread: gmack@innerfire.net: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:50 EST