Re: Promise 20269 support?

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 16:25:37 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Previous message: Stephen Lord: "Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > Does anyone know when (or if) the PDC20269 driver will be merged into the
> > official 2.4 kernel?
>
> With luck 2.4.19
>

What's the problem with it? I've been using the current one for a couple
of months without any problems, and I have tested it with a
half-a-terabyte RAID-0 with really high load. It's never let me down...

roy

-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Previous message: Stephen Lord: "Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:52 EST