Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree

From: Leonid Mamtchenkov (leonid@francoudi.com)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 05:11:36 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "swsusp eating disks in very strange way"
Previous message: Jan Harkes: "Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel?"
In reply to: Ken Brownfield: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
Next in thread: Yven Leist: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dear Ken Brownfield,

Once you wrote about "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree":
KB> I wouldn't be surprised if the next RH kernel included O(1) and the
KB> low-latency stuff. If it doesn't already. 2.4.18+O1+LOWLAT works great
KB> for me in production and seems like the best overall solution while we
KB> wait for 2.4.19+aa, and then possibly 2.x+rmap farther out.

Rawhide kernel 2.4.17 already has low latency patch applied.

-- Best regards, Leonid Mamtchenkov, RHCE System Administrator Francoudi & Stephanou Ltd.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "swsusp eating disks in very strange way"
Previous message: Jan Harkes: "Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel?"
In reply to: Ken Brownfield: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
Next in thread: Yven Leist: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:01 EST