Re: [PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 12:11:06 EST

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.4.19pre3aa2"
Previous message: Martin Wilck: "IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
In reply to: Tom Rini: "[PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:50:18AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hello. The following actually hides x86-specific drivers on
> !CONFIG_X86. The problem is that dep_bool '...' CONFIG_FOO $CONFIG_BAR
> doesn't have the desired effect if CONFIG_BAR isn't set.
>
> + if [ "$CONFIG_X86" = "y" ]; then
> + bool ' CMD640 chipset bugfix/support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640
> + dep_bool ' CMD640 enhanced support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640_ENHANCED $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640
> + fi

I've a PCI card with one of these. It could in theory work on any arch
with a PCI slot.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.4.19pre3aa2"
Previous message: Martin Wilck: "IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
In reply to: Tom Rini: "[PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] Actually hide x86 IDE chipsets on !CONFIG_X86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST