Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L

• Next message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "Re: [PATCH] get_pid() performance fix"
• Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?"
• Maybe in reply to: Russell King: "[PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Reply: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I distinctly recall it working perfectly OK in around 2.1.50. I had boxen
> where /sbin/init was a shell script which would bring up the interfaces,
> enable routing, and exit.

That's a different thing, I think.

That is, 'init exiting' versus 'all the code to prevent init being killed is bypassed and init is killed'

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "Re: [PATCH] get_pid() performance fix"
• Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?"
• Maybe in reply to: Russell King: "[PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Reply: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST