>Not only that MD5 shouldn't be the one. The crypto folks prefer SHA and for
>good reasons.
There is no problem with MD5 that makes it unsuitable for this particular
application. A SHA signature would enlarge each packet, further reducing the
effective MTU. This would increase the cost of what was intended to be a
simple mechanism to solve a specific problem (spoofed SYNs/RSTs).
What it comes down to is simply whether you care whether Linux machines can
interoperate with Cisco's BGP authentication scheme. This feature would be
very useful to me, so I personally do care, even if the scheme is not the
best possible scheme.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST