On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler
> is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.
>
> if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
> BUG();
> ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);
>
> If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never
> called during a completion, and/or is dangling. It is a typo my bad :-(
>
> Edit and change it from "==" to "!="
Now I'm confused. Should that be != to ==? :) And every instance I find?
-- SOCCER PLAYER IN GENITAL-BITING SCANDAL --- "It was something between friends that I thought would have no importance until this morning when I got up and saw all the commotion in the news," Gallardo told a news conference. "It stunned me." Reyes told Marca that he had "felt a slight pinch." -- http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/1129soccer29-ON.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST