This is the bases of the codes origin.
Comments?
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> Marcelo, Andre,
>
> Someone apparently added the "hook", but it was never used in the kernel,
>
> What is ide_xlate_1024 referring to?
>
> Jeff
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:22:27 +0800 (SGT)
> From: Jeff Chua <jeffchua@silk.corp.fedex.com>
> To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
> Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
> Cc: Jeff Chua <jchua@fedex.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] 2.4.19-pre3 ide_xlate_1024_hook ???
>
>
> It seems that the "ide_xlate_1024_hook" is redundant in
> ./drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
>
> It's not used anywhere by the kernel, and it caused "depmod" to fail
> with unknown ide_xlate_1024_hook symbol.
>
>
> Jeff
>
> Patch ...
>
> --- ./drivers/ide/ide-probe.c.org Thu Mar 14 11:01:20 2002
> +++ ./drivers/ide/ide-probe.c Thu Mar 14 11:03:16 2002
> @@ -987,7 +987,6 @@
> }
>
> #ifdef MODULE
> -extern int (*ide_xlate_1024_hook)(kdev_t, int, int, const char *);
>
> int init_module (void)
> {
> @@ -997,14 +996,12 @@
> ide_unregister(index);
> ideprobe_init();
> create_proc_ide_interfaces();
> - ide_xlate_1024_hook = ide_xlate_1024;
> return 0;
> }
>
> void cleanup_module (void)
> {
> ide_probe = NULL;
> - ide_xlate_1024_hook = 0;
> }
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> #endif /* MODULE */
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST