Hi
> > The background fsck capability, just like journalling or logging, are
> > typically only in needed in 24/7 systems (sure, they are nice to have in
> > your home system, but do you _REALLY_ need them? i don't!) and those
> > system typically are run on proven hardware which is operated well
> > within the specs. So please don't construct these kinds of arguments.
>
> You can already do background fsck on a linux system today. Just do it on
> a LVM/EVMS snapshot.
How do you fix errors you find by such background fsck?
Pavel
-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST