On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many
>> cpu's did you need to bring it out?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:48:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 2 physical - but i'd suggest to test Erich's patch instead. I had
> debugging code in the scheduler which did printks, which slowed down some
> of the operations in question, such as the startup of the idle thread -
> which created weird situations. [which might not occur in normal testing,
> but which are possible nevertheless.]
That's not many. I'll try it on a bigger one, with a few big fat printk's
in idle task startup and see if I can bring it down. It's an interesting
little tidbit of programming.
As I said earlier, Erich's patch already passed my testing. Thanks though.
Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST