Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 15:54:58 EST

Next message: Olaf Titz: "Re: novice coding in /linux/net/ipv4/util.c From: DJ Barrow <dj.barrow@asitatech.com>(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)"
Previous message: Doug Ledford: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 22 April 2002 22:47, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:57:55PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > I do. I don't agree with you that any of this has something to do with free
> > speech, but I'm willing to accept that you view the kernel source as a kind of
> > podium.
>
> I conjecture, then, that moving the BK doc to satisfy sensitivies is
> also acknowledge of the kernel sources as a podium :)

More like a monument. Currently, with a billboard on it.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Olaf Titz: "Re: novice coding in /linux/net/ipv4/util.c From: DJ Barrow <dj.barrow@asitatech.com>(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)(Обнаруженвирус!)"
Previous message: Doug Ledford: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST